| Looks pretty beat up huh? We'll get to that in a minute. |
After World War II, Russia was looking for a new service cartridge. They decided to develop a new cartridge rather than go with the highly popular .45ACP or 9mm Parabellum (commonly known as just 9mm today). Their thinking was that when soldiers get gunned down in the inevitable war with those capitalist pigs, their ammo would be incompatible and therefore useless to said swine when they looted the bodies of the proletariat. So the 9x18mm round was born.
![]() |
| 9x18 millimeters of full metal jacketed communist oppression. |
So fast forward 30 odd years to the 1980s. Czechoslovakia is still using the WWII-era Tokarev pistol and cartridge. The USSR leaned on them to modernize and adopt the 9x18mm Makarov cartridge. Rather than just go with it and take up the existing gun, the Czechs made a better version of the Makarov pistol. They added a double stack magazine to increase ammo capacity, changed the barrel design to add reliability and accuracy, and made all the pistol controls ambidextrous, so southpaw soldiers could shoot with confidence. The result was the CZ-82
Fast forward another 30 odd years to today. Surplus CZ-82s are shipped to the United States in the thousands. The guns are readily available and very inexpensive. But is the CZ-82 the perfect starter handgun? Let's see how it matches up.
Reliability: Every review, report, and video I've seen praises the reliability of these guns. CZ is known for making very high quality firearms. The CZ-82 is a very simple design, very few moving parts so there isn't alot to fail and go wrong. Any failure I've read about is attributed to cheap ammunition. There are no guys dropping this gun out of a plane or burying it for years just to see if it will still work but it is a fairly modern military firearm, designed to go to war. I can't say it's as reliable as a Glock but we'll still give reliability a PRO.
Price: By far the least expensive gun we'll look it. The market is proliferated with slightly-used CZ-82s that came over from Europe in crates. You can get said guns for $210. (and with a brand new USA-made barrel for $30 more.) Combine this with the fact that 9mm Makarov ammo is close to the least expensive on the market and you have a very thrifty option. For the cost of a used Glock, you can get a CZ-82 and 1000 rounds to practice. The $600 price tag of an entry-level 1911 gets you a CZ-82 with a new barrel, a DIY refinish (I promise we'll get to that finish in a minute) AND 1500 rounds! Price, more than any other gun we'll look at, is a PRO.
Capacity: Blah. Here's where things fall off a bit for our Czechoslovakian friend. The CZ-82 ships with one 12 round magazine. Meh. The pistol is smaller than the Glock so even though it uses a double stack magazine, capacity suffers a bit. Also, only shipping with one magazine is kind of a bummer. Then again, with all the cash you save, you'll have plenty of money for spare mags. Getting a spare magazine or two helps things out, as 25 or 37 rounds of 9x18mm would get the job done I imagine. Still, in the shadow of Glock's 17 round magazine, capacity is a CON.
Caliber: From the numbers I've looked at, it looks like the 9x18mm Makarov round (230ish ft/lbs) is below the 9mm Parabellum that the Glock shoots (over 400 ft/lbs, depending on the cartridge) in terms of energy delivered to target but slightly above the .380ACP round that many consider the bare minimum for self-defense (200 ft/lbs). .380ACP has blown up in popularity over the past couple years and if so many people are carrying it and trusting their lives to it, something stronger should be ok. 9x18mm Makarov also beats out the .38 special (also averages right around 200 ft/lbs), trusted by cops all over the country for years and still used by many for self defense. Penetration might be an issue but if I bought a CZ-82 and 1500 rounds and fired those rounds becoming proficient with said gun, I'd probably be better equipped to defend myself than getting a Glock and firing 500 rounds or a 1911 and 0 rounds. However, price of gun/round and capacity aside, the 9x18mm round leaves alot to be desired when compared to 9mm or .45ACP. CON.
Carryability: The smallest gun we've looked at so far. If you search for reviews on the CZ-82, alot of the reviewers laud the ability of the gun to make a good CCW piece. It is a half inch shorter than the Glock 17, an inch and a half shorter than a full-size 1911, and fairly slim due to it's small magazine. If the average person has no problem carrying this gun concealed, I shouldn't have an issue. Also, unlike the Glock, this gun has an external safety, so it would give me less heebie-jeebies to have it loaded with one in the chamber. Carryability is a PRO.
Misc:
- Looks: I love the way this gun looks and I know exactly why. It looks like James Bond's gun.
![]() |
| PPK. Walther PPK. |
| CZ-82. See the similarity? |
- Finish: Told you we'd get around to it. This kind of goes along with looks. A majority of the guns imported into the US were carried heavily and show heavy signs of wear on the finish. Also, the importer for alot of them had to stamp some markings into the slide and the cheap commie paint just flakes off. For a $200 gun what do you expect? This was a turn off to me initially until I found out that there is a process called dura-coating that you can do yourself for about $50 and make your gun look like this:
or this:
![]() |
| Both pictures borrowed from this forum post. |
Or any of a hundred other colors. Really anything you can think of. So like I said, for about $300, you can get a gun with a brand new barrel, in orange or red or "barney purple" (yea, it's really an option) and plenty of money for practice ammo.
- Customizability: You can refinish it and change the color and you can get replacement internal parts to adjust functionality but there aren't under-gun lights/lasers/etc (obviously) and while you can find replacement grips and such, there isn't near the market out there like there is for Glock or the 1911.
- History/Track Record: Although it was the official sidearm for the military, it was for the Czechoslovakian military. Not exactly a top world power. Also not used by any police departments/etc. The 9x18mm round has plenty of history but it doesn't quite match up to the likes of 9mm or .45ACP.
- Surplus: The fact that this gun was produced to defend a people is a plus. Also, this gun is C&R eligible. What that means is that anyone with a Curio&Relic Collector Federal Firearms License can have this gun shipped directly their door. For $30 and a couple months of waiting, you don't have to deal with doing everything thru a gunshop and paying the transfer fee. Another little plus.
- Ambidextriocity: I'm a lefty. Well, I write left lefthanded and do everything else right handed. I recently figured out that I'm left-eye dominant. I haven't done alot of pistol shooting so I don't know how this is going to affect me. I know alot of guys just shoot right handed but shift the gun so it's over on the left side. But if I can be a better marksman by shooting left handed, it would be nice to have a gun with southpaw-friendly controls.
- Competition: The Sportsmen's club my awesome wife just got me a membership too runs monthly practical shooting competitions thru USPSA (United States Practical Shooting Association). USPSA only allows competitors to use rounds of 9mm Parabellum or greater power. Since I'd love to try practical shooting, not being able to use this gun is a big drawback for me.
So Misc kind of works out to a wash.
We have 3 PROs, 2 CONs and a pretty much neutral Misc category. I think the CZ-82 warrants a serious look, especially from those who have a limited income. You get a military firearm in a caliber within the range most people would consider adequate for self-defense for a price lower than anything else we've looked at. That said, I'll probably only be looking at the CZ-82 if it becomes evident that I wouldn't be able to afford something with a higher capacity and in a different caliber. Five more rounds in a caliber that packs more of a punch is much more appealing to me. Who knows though, it might be a good choice to start me out for the next couple years while I save for something more substantial.
We have 3 PROs, 2 CONs and a pretty much neutral Misc category. I think the CZ-82 warrants a serious look, especially from those who have a limited income. You get a military firearm in a caliber within the range most people would consider adequate for self-defense for a price lower than anything else we've looked at. That said, I'll probably only be looking at the CZ-82 if it becomes evident that I wouldn't be able to afford something with a higher capacity and in a different caliber. Five more rounds in a caliber that packs more of a punch is much more appealing to me. Who knows though, it might be a good choice to start me out for the next couple years while I save for something more substantial.
What about you? Would you be comfortable defending your life with the 9x18mm round? Have you ever shot a CZ-82 or seen one shot? Any thoughts?



